Learn. Mem.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online before print January 3, 2007, 10.1101/lm.394707
LEARNING & MEMORY 14:17-21
©2007 by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press; ISSN 1072-0502/07 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
lm.394707v1
14/1-2/17    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Seidler, R. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Seidler, R. D.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Brief Communication
Aging affects motor learning but not savings at transfer of learning

Rachael D. Seidler

Department of Psychology, Division of Kinesiology, Neuroscience Program, Institute of Gerontology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, USA

Two important components of skill learning are the learning process itself (motor acquisition) and the ability to transfer what has been learned to new task variants (motor transfer). Many studies have documented age-related declines in the ability to learn new manual motor skills. In this study, I tested whether the degree of savings at transfer of learning is similarly affected by advancing age. Young and older adults made aiming movements with a joystick to hit targets presented on a computer screen, with real-time feedback display of their movement. They adapted to three different rotations of the feedback display in a sequential fashion, with return to the normal feedback display between each. Adaptation performance was better when it was preceded by other adaptive experiences, regardless of age.


Received August 2, 2006; accepted in revised form October 20, 2006.

E-mail rseidler{at}umich.edu; fax (734) 936-1925.

Article published online in January 2007. Article and publication date are at http://www.learnmem.org/cgi/doi/10.1101/lm.394707


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Learn. Mem.Home page
M. Merhav and K. Rosenblum
Facilitation of taste memory acquisition by experiencing previous novel taste is protein-synthesis dependent
Learn. Mem., July 14, 2008; 15(7): 501 - 507.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
R. D. Seidler and D. C. Noll
Neuroanatomical Correlates of Motor Acquisition and Motor Transfer
J Neurophysiol, April 1, 2008; 99(4): 1836 - 1845.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2007 by the Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press.