HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Vidal-Gonzalez, I. Articles by Quirk, G. J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Vidal-Gonzalez, I. Articles by Quirk, G. J. Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Research
Microstimulation reveals opposing influences of prelimbic and infralimbic cortex on the expression of conditioned fear

Ivan Vidal-Gonzalez¹, Benjamín Vidal-Gonzalez¹, Scott L. Rauch², and Gregory J. Quirk^1,3

¹ Department of Physiology, Ponce School of Medicine, Ponce, Puerto Rico 00732; ² Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, Massachusetts 02129, USA

Recent studies using lesion, infusion, and unit-recording techniques suggest that the infralimbic (IL) subregion of medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) is necessary for the inhibition of conditioned fear following extinction. Brief microstimulation of IL paired with conditioned tones, designed to mimic neuronal tone responses, reduces the expression of conditioned fear to the tone. In the present study we used microstimulation to investigate the role of additional mPFC subregions: the prelimbic (PL), dorsal anterior cingulate (ACd), and medial precentral (PrCm) cortices in the expression and extinction of conditioned fear. These are tone-responsive areas that have been implicated in both acquisition and extinction of conditioned fear. In contrast to IL, microstimulation of PL increased the expression of conditioned fear and prevented extinction. Microstimulation of ACd and PrCm had no effect. Under low-footshock conditions (to avoid ceiling levels of freezing), microstimulation of PL and IL had opposite effects, respectively increasing and decreasing freezing to the conditioned tone. We suggest that PL excites amygdala output and IL inhibits amygdala output, providing a mechanism for bidirectional modulation of fear expression.

³ Corresponding author.

E-mail gjquirk{at}yahoo.com; fax: (787) 844-1980.

Article is online at http://www.learnmem.org/cgi/doi/10.1101/lm.306106

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				E. Santini, G. J. Quirk, and J. T. Porter Fear Conditioning and Extinction Differentially Modify the Intrinsic Excitability of Infralimbic Neurons J. Neurosci., April 9, 2008; 28(15): 4028 - 4036. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. V. Baratta, T. R. Lucero, J. Amat, L. R. Watkins, and S. F. Maier Role of the ventral medial prefrontal cortex in mediating behavioral control-induced reduction of later conditioned fear Learn. Mem., January 29, 2008; 15(2): 84 - 87. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. C. ROBERTS, Y. REEKIE, and K. BRAESICKE Synergistic and Regulatory Effects of Orbitofrontal Cortex on Amygdala-Dependent Appetitive Behavior Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci., December 1, 2007; 1121(1): 297 - 319. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Hugues and R. Garcia Reorganization of learning-associated prefrontal synaptic plasticity between the recall of recent and remote fear extinction memory Learn. Mem., August 1, 2007; 14(8): 520 - 524. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. A. Corcoran and G. J. Quirk Activity in Prelimbic Cortex Is Necessary for the Expression of Learned, But Not Innate, Fears J. Neurosci., January 24, 2007; 27(4): 840 - 844. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]