Learn. Mem.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


LEARNING & MEMORY 11:356-363
©2004 by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press; ISSN 1072-0502/04 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Säfström, D.
Right arrow Articles by Edin, B. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Säfström, D.
Right arrow Articles by Edin, B. B.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Research Paper
Task Requirements Influence Sensory Integration During Grasping in Humans

Daniel Säfström and Benoni B. Edin1

Physiology Section, Department of Integrative Medical Biology, Umeå University, S-901 87 Umeå, Sweden

The sensorimotor transformations necessary for generating appropriate motor commands depend on both current and previously acquired sensory information. To investigate the relative impact (or weighting) of visual and haptic information about object size during grasping movements, we let normal subjects perform a task in which, unbeknownst to the subjects, the object seen (visual object) and the object grasped (haptic object) were never the same physically. When the haptic object abruptly became larger or smaller than the visual object, subjects in the following trials automatically adapted their maximum grip aperture when reaching for the object. This adaptation was not dependent on conscious processes. We analyzed how visual and haptic information were weighted during the course of sensorimotor adaptation. The adaptation process was quicker and relied more on haptic information when the haptic objects increased in size than when they decreased in size. As such, sensory weighting seemed to be molded to avoid prehension error. We conclude from these results that the impact of a specific source of sensory information on the sensorimotor transformation is regulated to satisfy task requirements.


Received October 22, 2003; accepted in revised form January 14, 2004.

Corresponding author.

1 E-MAIL Benoni.Edin{at}physiol.umu.se; FAX 46-90-7866683.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
L. J. Berryman, J. M. Yau, and S. S. Hsiao
Representation of Object Size in the Somatosensory System
J Neurophysiol, July 1, 2006; 96(1): 27 - 39.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Learn. Mem.Home page
D. Safstrom and B. B. Edin
Short-term plasticity of the visuomotor map during grasping movements in humans
Learn. Mem., January 1, 2005; 12(1): 67 - 74.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2004 by the Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press.